Subscribe to our mailing list
Get
Amongst It
Get
Amongst It
Send the government a message yourself:Â c.finlayson
[UPDATE] After sending the initial letter to Chris on 3rd December and getting no reply, I decided to follow up and recapitulate exactly the information I was after
Dear Chris,
I thought I had better flick you an email as I was reading over some legal criticisms of The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and noticed that since the Act is not higher law and does not “override” other laws, the Courts must interpret other laws consistently with the Bill of Rights Act if at all possible. All bills are assessed for consistency with BORAÂ before they are introduced into Parliament, and yet we see Cannabis Sativa introduced into the schedules of the Misuse of Drugs Act back in 1975 before we knew of it’s medicinal values and before NZ had any constitutionally guaranteed rights, without any debate in parliament and absolutely no public consultation whatsoever!
Now I understand that in our democracy, there is a good faith understanding that where there is an inconsistency in a bill, the Attorney-General must inform Parliament. While this does not prevent Parliament passing inconsistent laws, it does ensure that any issues are fully debated with respect to their impact on our nearly non-existent human rights!
I demand that you immediately inform parliament in your capacity as Attorney-General so that it* can be debated with urgency, and pressure placed upon all of parliament not just the ministry of health. We have some of the highest incarceration rates in the world and if you include home detention and community detention then we are number 1 in the English speaking world (see my infographic that plots all forms of incarceration over time), and three studies have proven that cannabis prohibition is used against the Maori to persecute them beyond what is reasonable.
It is my view that due to the fact that:
I currently have lodged an appeal in the High Court against a sentence of community detention that I recently acquired through a cannabis possession charge at my house that arose from an unwarranted search due to police smelling it. My home has been searched by police three times this year, once with a warrant, twice without, and yet never has a supply charge resulted.
This appeal is likely not a good use of High Court time but I am confident to be granted at least a call over hearing for this possession charge, based on the valid points I’ve raised in this letter being present in my appeal also.
* I’d appreciate you to ask parliament that Cannabis be removed from the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 since it is incompatible with Bill of Rights Act 1990 due to multiple breaches of at least 5 sections below, not to mention the Health Act 1956 and the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.; the repeal of the Tohunga Suppression Act etc etc. and that work be done with urgency on developing a regulatory framework for the taxation of the industry. This would remove a lucrative source of income for gangs, and make it harder to children to access.
Section 21 Our right to privacy: such as the right to an expectation against unreasonable search and seizure while out and about but especially in the privacy in ones own home so long as it does not injure another person
Section 27 The right to justice: “Irrelevant to case” evidence such as general case law, scientific studies government reports, legislation and the outcomes of cases in other countries are unlikely to have been deemed admissible to show by defence to a judge alone trial, since the judge would be unable to consider our human rights (due to them being well non-existent)
Section 13 Our right to practice our own religions; such as Cantheism, a theology that considers cannabis sativa a holy sacrament
Section 9 Not to be subjected to cruel treatment: nobody seems to have any idea what our Corrections system is doing to innocent cannabis growers and dealers – these are nice people too – but we do have one of the highest suicide rates in the world in New Zealand.
Section 22 Liberty of the person being the right not to be arbitrarily arrested or detained: NZ Citizens have lost the right to a trial by a jury of our peers; for cannabis possession does not qualify for jury trial, yet this is the only way I can move to have my human rights considered?
[1] You must inform Parliament see http://www.justice.govt.nz/publications/global-publications/n/the-new-zealand-legal-system/bill-of-rights-act
[2] A peak of 18,000 citizens detained in 2010 according to corrections see:Â https://www.legalise.org.nz/infographic/
[3] https://norml.org.nz/2012/540000-current-marijuana-users/
[4]Â http://www.horizonpoll.co.nz/page/203/540000-using-marijuana-in-past-year
[5] 58 websites carry stories on van Gaalen case:Â https://www.legalise.org.nz/public-interest/
[6] Learn about the science here:Â https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNz1GsjbqaE
Also I found evidence that you imbibe yourself, it seems fairly legit:
Today is the birth of a new category on the website: How to defend your self in court or “Rep Self” as I like to say!
I’ll update this category with useful information relevant to the self defence in court as it comes to hand!
Request a Pre sentencing indication – simulates a Guilty plea, buys your more time to prepare your defence. Here you can ask for a jury trial and they will be able to strike out your charges because they do not feel cannabis is serious enough for it.
Consult a duty solicitor.
A good article about the Pre Trial Process is here on the Community Law website.
Finally, Appeal your sentence in the High Court. More info soon…
Toward the end of the alcohol prohibition in USA, juries ceased convicting good honest people for alcohol, and the same will happen in New Zealand soon I believe.
For charges that are to be heard by a judge alone, without a jury, the case review will take place 30 working days after the defendant pleads not guilty.
For Category 3 offences (that is, offences carrying a prison term of two years or more), defendants have the right to choose a jury trial, and if they do so, the case review takes place 45 working days after the not guilty plea.

Soldiers burned marijuana plants found in a field of blue agave in Jalisco State in Mexico. Leaders in Latin America are questioning Washington’s hard-line antidrug strategy in the region. Credit Hector Guerrero/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
This just in from the news desk! Report thanks to leafly:Â https://www.leafly.com/news/headlines/breaking-mexico-supreme-court-rules-cannabis-prohibition-unconstiÂ
Mexico’s Supreme Court made a monumental decision today that could lay the groundwork for a legalization movement with some serious traction. The vote by the Supreme Court’s criminal chamber ruled that it is unconstitutional to prohibit individuals from growing and distributing cannabis for personal use.
This ruling may allow law enforcement to focus on more serious, violent crime, such as murder, kidnapping, and violent assault, and lessen the penalties against low-level, nonviolent drug offenders.