Subscribe to our mailing list

 

Log of all Proceeds of Crime / Criminal Proceeds Act forfeitures

***UPDATE*** 2016 I’ve made an official complaint to the serious fraud office

Did you know the government can seize your assets without a conviction? All they need now is an allegation that a crime may have taken place. Here is a record of every forfeiture ever done since 2003…

So I got frustrated by the slow progress of cannabis legalisation in this country and decided I’d like to know how much money the government is currently potentially getting from their nasty little Criminal Proceeds Act.

This is the request:

Please supply a log of every forfiture ever done under the Proceeds of Crime act. In order to anonymise the data, I am happy to only receive a subset of the total records, but must include

  • date of forfiture
  • amount in dollars
  • geographic region (can be granular such as Otago/Auckland)
  • name of the law or laws that were allegidly broken
  • current status of the forfiture (in order to see if refunds are being given for falsely done forfitures)
  • ideally a serial code / ID code to help ensure the data is real and provide (not strictly required)
This should be dating back to 1991 when it was put into law.
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1991/0120/latest/DLM250669.html

They responded with a PDF file made from rasterised text (I’d need to re-type it) which I redacted and rasterised below.

I’ve also data entered the scan into Excel to produce the following digital version of the data.

Excel file version of table below: Official Information Request

Forfeiture order amounts by city shows nothing for four cities and heaps for Whangarei

Forfeiture order amounts by city shows nothing for four cities and heaps for Whangarei

Time corelation shows that this is not a very effective tax collection method

Time corelation shows that this is not a very effective tax collection method

Number of forfeiture orders granted or granted by consent
between 2003 and 12 August 2013
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 TOTAL
Auckland 6 16 6 33 17 9 19 11 6 1 124
Wellington 1 1 2 9 5 5 2 1 2 28
Christchurch 2 3 2 2 3 12
Dunedin 1 1
Hamilton 2 2
Invercagill 1 1
Napier 1 1
New Plymouth 1 1 2
Palmerston
North
0
Rotorua 4 4 3 3 2 16
Whangarei 1 4 2 1 1 9 1 1 20
TOTAL 4 11 24 10 45 30 20 26 21 10 6 207
Forfeiture
order $ amounts ‘granted’ or ‘granted by consent’ between 2003 and 12 August
2013
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 TOTAL
Auckland $49,764 $68,429 $9,037 $139,040 $14,850 $142,549 $102,970 $225,677 $50,365 $8,950 $811,631
Wellington $36,904 $96,816 $1,800 $545 $3,124 $940 $140,129
Christchurch $3,479,965 $5,042 $5,316 $1,300 $3,398,425 $6,890,048
Dunedin $3,000 $3,000
Hamilton $0
Invercagill $0
Napier $0
New Plymouth $0
Palmerston
North
$764,830 $764,830
Rotorua $5,838 $5,800 $2,465 $14,103
Whangarei $774 $664,500 $4,100 $2,020 $3,000,000 $3,671,394
TOTAL $3,480,739 $57,806 $738,245 $45,941 $237,156 $3,423,213 $150,149 $105,535 $231,266 $3,050,365 $774,720 $12,295,135

 

I also asked if it included the assets seized from one Kim Dotcom, to this their answer – from the Police this time – was as follows:

Police response in regards to Kim Dotcom Confiscations

Police response in regards to Kim Dotcom Confiscations

 

 

Page 1

Page 1

Page 2

Page 2

Page 3

Page 3

Page 4

Page 4